<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yoko Ono&#8217;s copyright suit against creationist film fails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/07/29/yoko-ono%e2%80%99s-copyright-suit-against-creationist-film-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/07/29/yoko-ono%e2%80%99s-copyright-suit-against-creationist-film-fails/</link>
	<description>The voice of atheism since 1881</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:48:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barry Duke</title>
		<link>http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/07/29/yoko-ono%e2%80%99s-copyright-suit-against-creationist-film-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-7150</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=1216#comment-7150</guid>
		<description>As I understand it, the song pops up to provide an example of how evil science and media folks are waging war on religion. I know the film has extensive footage of Nazi atrocities, which it blames on evolutionists, but do not know whether Imagine was played over any of the footage. 
As for the law suit itself, the best background I could find to the case appeared &lt;a href=&quot;http://richarddawkins.net/articleComments,2477,Yoko-Ono-Filmmakers-Caught-in-Expelled-Flap,Ethan-Smith,page3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here &lt;/a&gt;on Dawkinsâ€™ website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, the song pops up to provide an example of how evil science and media folks are waging war on religion. I know the film has extensive footage of Nazi atrocities, which it blames on evolutionists, but do not know whether Imagine was played over any of the footage.<br />
As for the law suit itself, the best background I could find to the case appeared <a href="http://richarddawkins.net/articleComments,2477,Yoko-Ono-Filmmakers-Caught-in-Expelled-Flap,Ethan-Smith,page3" rel="nofollow">here </a>on Dawkinsâ€™ website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/07/29/yoko-ono%e2%80%99s-copyright-suit-against-creationist-film-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-7140</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=1216#comment-7140</guid>
		<description>Mant to add: I agree totally with emil. Using an atheist song for a film promoting religious dogma is totally out of place. It&#039;s a bit like using &quot;O Come all ye faithful&quot; in a porn movie !!

Rog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mant to add: I agree totally with emil. Using an atheist song for a film promoting religious dogma is totally out of place. It&#8217;s a bit like using &#8220;O Come all ye faithful&#8221; in a porn movie !!</p>
<p>Rog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/07/29/yoko-ono%e2%80%99s-copyright-suit-against-creationist-film-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-7139</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=1216#comment-7139</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know if Yoko is going to Sue for breach of copyright ? If I&#039;m reading this right, she&#039;s failed to get an injunction to stop the film being shown - but is she getting royalties ? And how much of a say does she have over the song&#039;s use ? My knowledge of US copyright law isn&#039;t good, so I&#039;d appreciate someone filling me in!

Rog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if Yoko is going to Sue for breach of copyright ? If I&#8217;m reading this right, she&#8217;s failed to get an injunction to stop the film being shown &#8211; but is she getting royalties ? And how much of a say does she have over the song&#8217;s use ? My knowledge of US copyright law isn&#8217;t good, so I&#8217;d appreciate someone filling me in!</p>
<p>Rog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cohen</title>
		<link>http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/07/29/yoko-ono%e2%80%99s-copyright-suit-against-creationist-film-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-7113</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=1216#comment-7113</guid>
		<description>im going to see the film for the fun of it--i want to take some friends who have sore backsides from sitting on the fence over the  Rationalist-religious debate - they need to see what atheists  are up against in the USA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im going to see the film for the fun of it&#8211;i want to take some friends who have sore backsides from sitting on the fence over the  Rationalist-religious debate &#8211; they need to see what atheists  are up against in the USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reluctantfundie</title>
		<link>http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/07/29/yoko-ono%e2%80%99s-copyright-suit-against-creationist-film-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-7108</link>
		<dc:creator>reluctantfundie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=1216#comment-7108</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be one of the gaga parade welcoming it&#039;s arrival. In fact, I&#039;m going to the USA in a week, I might get a copy and start infecting the blogosphere right away.

Thanks for the Ono info, I was wondering how that case would end up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be one of the gaga parade welcoming it&#8217;s arrival. In fact, I&#8217;m going to the USA in a week, I might get a copy and start infecting the blogosphere right away.</p>
<p>Thanks for the Ono info, I was wondering how that case would end up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil</title>
		<link>http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/07/29/yoko-ono%e2%80%99s-copyright-suit-against-creationist-film-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-7105</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=1216#comment-7105</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it kind of ironic that an pro-ID movie would choose a so pro-atheistic song? Didn&#039;t they reflect over the song lyrics: &quot;no hell below us, above us only sky&quot;, &quot;and no religion too&quot;?

I haven&#039;t seen the movie, but it seems an odd choice to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it kind of ironic that an pro-ID movie would choose a so pro-atheistic song? Didn&#8217;t they reflect over the song lyrics: &#8220;no hell below us, above us only sky&#8221;, &#8220;and no religion too&#8221;?</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the movie, but it seems an odd choice to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
