Comments on: Darwinism is the root of terrorism; Islam the antidote

By: Anthony Notrh

Anthony Notrh — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:12:39 +0000

Saqib. If the theory of evolution is so scientifically inept why is it that Adnan Oktar can't even post a rebuttal of it without misunderstanding it completely?
The answer is that Adnan Oktar is scientifically inept, and morally suspect. He isn't even an orthodox muslim, since he is trying to claim to be a messiah for his own criminal ends.

By: Saqib Munir Khan

Saqib Munir Khan — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:23:40 +0000

Darwinism was a Zionist Jews conspiracy to humanize animal and dehumanized man. Since the Zionist Jews consider non-Jews as inferior humans and them as God’s selected creation; so it was necessary that a scientific theory had to be propounded that corroborated with their religious belief that non-Jews were subordinate specie.

Since the Zionist Jews were the richest minority in the West and controlling European economies, financial and industrial sectors, and suffocating western politics; it was essential that the philosophy of ‘Capitalism and materialism’ was propagated amongst the elite and masses to distance them from Christianity.

Theory if Evolution, however, preposterous and scientifically inept facilitated, colonialism, secularism, atheism and materialism in19th century Europe. Darwinism is the cause of all evil that has affected the West since its inception and encouraged, immorality, lewdness, vulgarity, greed and an absurd logic that th3e concept of God is irrelevant and not need in a civilized society and running of a secular and democratic government.

By: Alun

Alun — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:55:43 +0000

Got this alternative name for muslims from a sadly anonymous source on a Canadian blog – Koranimals. Wish I could take credit for this.

By: Alun

Alun — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:39:25 +0000

Wot a load of shite. After stephen green, this is the sort of bloke that gets headbutted in pubs.

By: Pegase89

Pegase89 — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:56:16 +0000

In a way the guy got a point. Islam is not the problem. Religion is the problem. If human kind is gonna survive his own stupidity it as to be by getting rid of this shit. Unforthunately human stupidity. the universe and the religion have something in common. They are all in perpetual expention. It seams.

By: Rozi

Rozi — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:57:21 +0000

For someone so down on capitalism and imperialism, he’s very keen on designer clothes. He must be the Simon Cowell of Islam, he’s even wearing his trousers some where around his chin!

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:28:49 +0000

Look at that picture, and the Range Rover in the background…

Come on, it’s George Michael having us on, right?

By: Shargraves

Shargraves — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:02:14 +0000

Looks like a bond villain if you ask me. And he is an enemy of thought.

Hmm. Thats a good name for a band.

By: LD

LD — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:42:03 +0000

Atheism goes hand in hand with materialism?!?!? It’s not just this nutter who says so, the arch bish of York said it too.

Should I conclude from this that I am missing out? Are the rest of you counting your vast City bonuses, glugging Krug on your yachts and playing polo at weekends?

And another thing, aren’t the Vatican and the CofE amongst the wealthiest organisations on the planet? Taking ‘collections’ from poor old ladies so that Ratzi, Sentamu & Co can have golden robes and headgear studded with jewels.

By: Andy Armitage

Andy Armitage — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:22:38 +0000

What about all those systems (under different names, of course, or no name at all) before Chuck came on the scene? Were there no equaivlents of communism etc.? Were people not materialistic? And did they not require this materialism to come up with whatever way people were ruled back then, such as absolute monarchy? Did the feudal system not require an eye to the material? And without Darwin, no immorality? Can I get back to my wank now?