Comments on: Loopy evangelical tracts land Singapore couple in jail

By: SunnyF

SunnyF — Fri, 14 May 2010 08:18:45 +0000

The pair claimed ignorance in their defence, saying they did not know the contents of the booklets and had no reason to believe they had a seditious tendency.

I agreed with aaa on June 15th 2009: “I think they’re saying that so they get in less trouble…” (would appreciate if you get a proper name, no one is going to turn you to jail even if you put your name there, you’re not a bad fella like these two clowns). Their statement made them a liar, which is against their belief (and i believe they took oath on the court, ironic isn’t it?).

Secondly, even though they’re not lying, it reflects that these are the clowns that creating half of the trouble in the universe, by spreading things without really knowing what’s inside. They should be sentenced an 8 years sentence instead.

By: MichaelL

MichaelL — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:10:19 +0000

I think at one time, Chick tracts were banned from Canada because they are considered hate literature. Although, I must say that there is a thriving underground of Chick Tract collectors. No, I’m not talking about hell fire and brimstone evangelicals either. Even us godless atheist heathens can admit that there is a certain amount of awesomeness in the absurdity of these tracts!

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:16:32 +0000

Ahh Singapore, they've got the right idea. They have gay pride marches that encourage patriotism too, the last gay pride event i went to was constantly playing songs about destroying your TV and had a "spraypaint art workshop", and we all know what that means – it's art, it's vandalism!

By: Dear Allah… « “Gone Fishin’: Postcards From God”

Dear Allah… « “Gone Fishin’: Postcards From God” — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:12:52 +0000

[...] Me. And just so You know, (but really to make You queasy), I’m having a cargo ship full of Chick Tracts diverted from Singapore to Iran. Nothing would make Me laugh harder than converting a country [...]

By: valdemar

valdemar — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:24:31 +0000

The classic example of free speech curtailed is that you can't shout fire in a crowded theatre. Should people be allowed to spread religious hatred, knowing damn well that it can lead to death and destruction in a less obvious and immediate way than stampeding a crowd in a confined space? Tricky one. But Jack Chick is so absurd that most Christians in the UK would be embarrassed by him. Do we want to spare Christians embarrassment?

By: anti.relon

anti.relon — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:05:30 +0000

Chick is fab. Do not pressure for it to be nabbed anywhere.

By: Buffy

Buffy — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:25:00 +0000

Try this one: http://www.weirdcrap.com/chick/intro.html

By: Buffy

Buffy — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:25:00 +0000

Try this one: http://www.weirdcrap.com/chick/intro.html

By: Buffy

Buffy — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:25:00 +0000

Try this one: http://www.weirdcrap.com/chick/intro.html

By: jay

jay — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:44:10 +0000

As much as the Chick tracts are an offense against intelligence, the danger of suppression is far greater. In this case I guess I have to take the side of the Chick pushers.