Religious nutjob botches his own circumcision, then damages his son’s penis

A GOD-ADDLED Vancouver man who circumcised his four-year-old son at home with a razor blade, then used blood coagulant meant for horses, has been found guilty of negligence causing bodily harm.

The man, identified in a court ruling only  as DJW, admitted that in 2007 he circumcised his son, DJ, who was born at 2.5 pounds and couldn’t be circumcised at birth.

circumcisionThe man performed the circumcision just a few years after he circumcised himself, according to this grisly report via Joe.My.God.

As a result, he damaged his dick in nine places, and doctors had to suture it at hospital. His penis became infected, according to lawyer, Doug Christie, who said:

He learned from that experience to do things differently.

Justice Marion Allan of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Vancouver ruled that the negligence charge was warranted but acquitted DJW on charges of aggravated assault and assault with a weapon. Social workers who found out about the circumcision a day after the procedure reported the incident to child-protection services.

DJW initially claimed a circumcision performed with reasonable care would fall under a religious exemption, Christie said. But he dropped the argument based on the judge’s ruling.

Although we don’t agree, the judge found it wasn’t with reasonable care.

DJW is a former Jehovah’s Witness who is now hooked on both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible. Here’s what happened, according to the judge’s summary of the case:

DJW became interested in circumcision after reading the books of Richard Hoskins, who advocates circumcision and claims there are Biblical answers to:

All of the problems in society, including the number of abortions and homosexuals, and the national debt.

After DJ’s birth, DJW heard a radio show on circumcision, transcribed it and decided to circumcise himself. On the Internet, he found “horrible pictures of what could go wrong,” which is “inconsistent with his frequently expressed opinion that circumcision is an obvious and simple procedure,” the judge noted.

In late 2004 or early 2005, DJW circumcised himself, using a razor, Band-Aids, peroxide, a roll of gauze and a clear plastic ring that he believed would act as an anaesthetic.

After he cut himself, the bleeding wouldn’t stop. DJW then called his mother to tell her he was a heretic and would never go back to her church. She told him to call 911 and hung up. He then called 911 and went to the emergency room of a hospital and was sutured. In 2006, DJW began asking doctors about the circumcision of DJ. A few doctors advised against circumcising a four-year-old boy and refused to help him.

One doctor that agreed to do it was too expensive, charging $2,000 to $5,000. DJW decided to do it himself. He bought a blood coagulant used for horses because it was cheaper than a $30 coagulant for people. He told DJ that circumcision might hurt a bit but not for long. DJW told his son the procedure would grant him:

Extra special protection from God.

It would also allow him to eat Passover lamb, ice cream and pick all the movies he wanted for a week. He also said told DJ it would be difficult to stay together as a family if DJ didn’t agree to be circumcised.

DJW then gave DJ a teacup of homemade honey wine with eight to 12 percent alcohol. He laid DJ on clean garbage bags on the kitchen floor and put a towel or diaper under him, then cut the foreskin, sometimes with a sawing motion.

DJ shuddered and cried, and DJW’s hand slipped. He told DJ to be still for a second cut. He used paper towels and a veterinary blood coagulant meant for horses, and the bleeding decreased. DJ then had to go to a children’s hospital.

A “beehive coating” of ash was removed from his penis and he was properly circumcised by Dr Afshar.

In court, Afshar questioned DJW’s procedure. Among numerous problems: The blades DJW used were neither sharp nor sterile. He said a kitchen cutting board under the boy’s penis could have been covered with bacteria from food. And he said the veterinary coagulant was inappropriate and could have led to bleeding, infection and necrosis.

Afshar testified that BC law doesn’t ban people who have no medical training from performing circumcisions.

HAT TIP: Peter Brietbart.