STILL smarting over the fact that his website, Revolution Muslim, was buggered by hackers after it issued death threats against South Park creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker, Younus Abdullah Muhammad has described as “unfair” the press coverage his loopy outfit received after it had threatened the duo.
Speaking to Gawker.com, the foam-flecked fundie fulminated:

Younus Abdullah Muhammad grinning ... but not at South Park
It was typical of the mainstream media. It was senseless … they never cover any of the other crimes against Islam we write about.
Most Americans, the psychotic dipstick added, are:
Dumbed down, stupid and pathetic. They’re worried more about missing their favourite TV show than they are about the world.
And he stands by his group’s prediction of violence against the South Park creators.
It’s very justifiable to act violently against Western aggression.
The extremist implied in his conversation with Gawker that he has previously had some contact with the FBI regarding a trip to an Islamic country, but he would not give specific details of the incident.
He said :
It is American oppression.
But he added that the Gawker folk probably wouldn’t understand such issues as they were:
Darwinist faggots who are as despicable as the rest, walking around eating your Triscuits.

Mmmm. Triscuits ... but are they halal?
Triscuits? Why Triscuits, for fuck’s sake?
Pressed on the question, Muhammad snapped:
It doesn’t matter what your favorite crackers or cookies are. They are not more important than the hegemonic wars the West is fighting against Islam.
He directed Gawker to a statement published on an alternative Revolution Muslim site (the main one is still kaput) which states:
Free speech is a vital tool in the staving of oppression, but this function has its limits …Today “free speech” is interpreted as the right to promote pornography, homosexuality, slander, and libel against even that which is considered sacred.
The statement adds:
As for the Islamic ruling on the situation [ie depicting Big Mo in a bear costime], then this is clear. There is no difference of opinion from those with any degree of a reputation that the punishment is death. Ibn Taymiyyah a great scholar of Islam says, ‘Whoever curses the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) – a Muslim or a non Muslim – then he must be killed’ … and this is the opinion of the general body of Islamic scholars.
This shows that taking this stance is virtually obligatory, but it does not mean that our taking this stance is in some way an absolute call toward the requirement that the creators of South Park must be killed, nor a deliberate attempt at incitement, it is only to declare the truth regardless of consequence and to offer an awareness in the mind of Westerners when they consider doing the same thing.
The statement continues:
Many are proclaiming that the South Park episode’s insult was minimal and some might inquire about a situation where the insult is not that great. The renowned scholar Imam Malik said, ‘If someone says that the button of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) is dirty, then he should be executed!’
Watch the lunatic Muhammad in full cry here.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAorhgNqQoc[/youtube]
Meanwhile, it is reported this week that episode 201 of South Park was heavily censored.
According to Mediawatchwatch, not only did they censor the image of Mo, but they bleeped out every mention of his name. Just to be on the safe side.
Parker and Stone are not happy. A statement on southparkstudios.com (not viewable in UK, except by proxy), they say:
In the 14 years we’ve been doing South Park we have never done a show that we couldn’t stand behind. We delivered our version of the show to Comedy Central and they made a determination to alter the episode. It wasn’t some meta-joke on our part. Comedy Central added the bleeps. In fact, Kyle’s customary final speech was about intimidation and fear. It didn’t mention Muhammad at all but it got bleeped too. We’ll be back next week with a whole new show about something completely different and we’ll see what happens to it.
Said MWW:
By giving in to the threats of RevolutionMuslim.com, Comedy Central has made a tiny band of idiots feel very big and clever.
See Tom Chivers’ “Why I feel solidarity with the creators of South Park” in the Telegraph. The thrust of his article is that we should all stand up to Islamist bullies.
Hat tip: Name Withheld


The Freethinker was founded in 1881 by GW Foote, an outspoken critic of religion. After the publication of 
April 24th, 2010 at 8:18 am
*SPOILERS*
Islamofascist morons. How they aren’t clearly in jail for deliberately threatening violence I don’t know. That slippery word play that they are trying to intimate that they were just stating “facts” is pure steaming bullshit – but I digress. This shite all came about because of Moohamed in a bear suit? well the tosspots are wrong. IT was Santa Claus in the bear suit the whole time! LOL!
And as to the bleeping out of the 2nd episode. EVERYONE is bleeped at the end – for whole speeches. Its funny.
I think they were taking hte piss again – and as moohamed was always presented in South Park as a black block with censored written on it – this was no different to his previous appearance.
Besides – South Park is far more culturally worthy and valuable to society than the mindless barbarity Islam EVER was. I know who I’m siding with – even if I’m not that much of a fan of it these days.
April 24th, 2010 at 8:42 am
Time for someone to blow this piece of shit away!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
April 24th, 2010 at 9:22 am
Free speech doesn’t work that way, douchebag. If it has limits then it isn’t free.
April 24th, 2010 at 9:48 am
“Dumbed down, stupid and pathetic. They’re worried more about missing their favourite TV show than they are about the world.”
I will give him that… :/
But the most dumbed-down, stupid, and pathetic of all was Comedy Central, for self-censoring. Thank goodness others are speaking out. Ayaan Hirsi Ali was interviewed on Anderson Cooper 360 again last night (from an undisclosed location, they made sure to tell us), and the whole segment pulled no punches on the importance of hanging on to freedom of speech.
The LA Times also came up with a thoughtful piece
http://www.latimes.com/enterta.....0860.story
“UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh said that although he sympathizes with the predicament faced by Comedy Central, the network has potentially empowered other extremists by how it has chosen to handle the situation.”
April 24th, 2010 at 10:57 am
If America ever reaches the point where a frustration with islam forces some to violence, then I’m sure they’ll start with this charming fellow first.
http://www.islam-watch.org/Bil.....hammad.jpg
April 24th, 2010 at 12:49 pm
Well, having watched the youtube on this bloke, he seemed to be steadfastly ignored by all and sundry. Always a good thing, it seems to me. I’ve never watched Southpark but if Comedy Central had done the same thing he wouldn’t be getting the free press he gets now.
April 24th, 2010 at 2:23 pm
Ayatollah Khomeini: “There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humour in Islam. There is no fun in Islam.†And I would like to add: “There is no life or humanity in Islam.” I’m glad I know quite some Muslims who love laughter and life, so there’s still hope.
April 24th, 2010 at 3:59 pm
Democracy equips Islamic extremists with all the necessary tools to undermine it. It’s so frustrating to have to tolerate their (not always veiled) threats and look on as large corporations and Government pander to them!
Perhaps we need an atheist political party – take note, Professor Dawkins – to offer hope to the masses of ordinary people who are disillusioned with the current wishy-washy choices!
April 24th, 2010 at 5:40 pm
comedy central didn’t even show episode 201 and they never repeated episode 200 which they were more than happy to show only a week before, I tuned in last night expecting the censorship and was hoping to catch the repeat of episode 200 but they didn’t show either episode at all in the UK and I’m really fucking pissed off and won’t be watching comedy central at all until they stop being pussies and show both episodes in their entirety as matt and trey intended, oh and all this censorship just proves the point that south park was trying to make.
Fuck comedy central I’m boycotting them.
April 24th, 2010 at 7:19 pm
It seems a rather pathetic god which claims omnipotence, but requires wild-eyed thugs to commit acts of wanton violence in order to protect His honor.
April 24th, 2010 at 8:05 pm
Settle down Zombie and take hope. The same thing happened with the scientology episode. Comedy Central was just covering their asses against law suits. As soon as the lawyers are all satisfied they are in the clear, the episode will air in its entirety. It’s sure to happen because the US has a “parody” law which basically insures that we can make fun of anything or anybody.
But, I wonder which gives Islam the worse image? A pedophile prophet in a bear suit, or overt public death threats by an imam? America doesn’t have to destroy them, they are destroying themselves.
I guess when I say, “Fuck Muhammed” I endanger my life. But what if I seasoned it with a “Fuck Jehovah”? Is that better?
NeoWolfe
April 24th, 2010 at 8:28 pm
Episode 201 is available at: http://www.xepisodes.com/south.....6/201.html
However, I think the server is maxed out. Streaming video is extremely choppy.
NeoWolfe
April 24th, 2010 at 11:01 pm
Where can I get a t-shirt with “Darwinist Trisuit Eating Faggot” on it?
April 25th, 2010 at 12:45 am
Who cares about his insane fairy tales anyway?
April 25th, 2010 at 3:00 pm
yet more love and understanding from ‘the religeon of piss’. When does the dvd come out?
April 26th, 2010 at 6:08 pm
This just in, we go to breaking news that Islamist extremists have once again forced censorship of free speech using violence. We go live on the scene, Kathy?
Thanks Tom. Today we saw an outpouring of some really stupid people. These people claim to be enlightened, forward-thinking individuals, but have failed to realize the irony in using freedom of speech granted by a country in order to terrorize that country. Once again, these religious, self-righteous bastards have won in their attempts to scare people into behaving the way they want, completely undermining the founding father’s dream of a free society. Will the rest of society have the balls to call these so-called “men” out? Or will the christian right wing support them in order to get their own agenda of censorship a boost? Will a war be triggered between the two religions, or will the sane and rational people finally stand up, throw all the extreme fundamentalists in jail to fight it out on pay-per-view? Only time will tell, back to you Tom.
Thanks, Kathy. Well, I think I can speak for all rationalists when I say that I am proud to support modern science and social progress, and these whiny, knee-jerk reactionists should put themselves on a bus and drive it off a cliff so the rest of us can go have a good time. Sorry for those of you expecting something new in today’s “News”, it’s just that the same shit keeps happening.
April 30th, 2010 at 2:17 am
Free speech is a vital tool in the staving of oppression, but this function has its limits …Today “free speech†is interpreted as the right to promote pornography, homosexuality, slander, and libel against even that which is considered sacred.
What a clueless a-hole! The ultimate purpose of free speech is to help find the Truth and uncover errors and lies so that we can sift them out and reject them, so that we know the Truth, so we can act on the Truth. Tyrants and oppressors like him live off of lies and deceit. And by the way, wouldn’t his implication that Islam’s “god” can be “harmed” itself be blasphemy under Islam? Looks like a fatwa may be coming down on his head (or neck) soon.
September 19th, 2010 at 12:19 pm
Galileo only got house-arrest. Wonder what he would have got from the mad moham-mads.
Strangely these fanatics also claim to have invented science and mathematics (you know,algebra,algorithm, sine) which were then stolen by the West.
When I used the term “Hindu-Arabic” numerals I was castigated by one them: nothing to do with Indians he claimed.