A SURVEY carried out by the Daily Mail reveals that less than one per cent of cards stocked by supermarkets have religious themes.
Some had no cards at all with religious references in their extensive ranges.

Customers are far more likely to choose this sort of card at Xmas
The paper visited major outlets of the big four supermarkets – Asda, Sainsbury’s, Tesco and Morrisons – in seven towns and cities.
Out of 5,363 cards sold individually or in multipacks, just 45 featured Christian scenes such as the Nativity – 0.8 per cent.
The “worst offender” was Morrisons, which had six out of a range of 973 cards, or 0.6 per cent.
Second “worst” was Tesco, despite chief executive Sir Terry Leahy, a practising Catholic, writing to a customer in October to tell her:
We have increased the number of Christmas cards that will be available with a religious theme this year.
Dr Don Horrocks, of the Evangelical Alliance, said supermarkets were:
Airbrushing Christ out of Christmas.There has been a rise in cards that say ‘Season’s greetings’ or ‘Happy holidays’ which is evidence of the speeding up of the trend of stripping the religion out of Christian festivals.
Stephen “Birdshit” Green, the solitary voice of Christian Voice, added:
The situation is caused by managers subscribing to political correctness and the idea that in some way Christian cards are offensive to other religions. This is simply not true.
Even Muslims have been jumping on the bandwagon. Anas Altikriti, of the Muslim Association of Britain, said he was “worried” at the increasing secularisation of Britain.
People who are looking for proper choice of Christmas cards should raise it with the store manager.
The Mail was contacted by a Tesco customer earlier this week who said her local store in Ely, Cambridgeshire, had just a “handful” of cards with religious themes last year – and still had only three out of 67 last month, despite a personal assurance from Sir Terry.
After she had repeatedly contacted customer services, she received a letter from the company chief. She moaned:
Sir Terry promised more cards this year. But the selection of cards with anything relating to the true meaning of Christmas was tiny, so he has not kept his word.
Tesco said it had doubled the range of religiously themed cards this year but refused to give numbers, saying they “vary from store to store”.
An Asda spokesman said:
We sell five different Christmas cards that have religious sentiment and traditional designs.
And Morrisons said:
We stock types of cards that appeal to our customers.
A Sainsbury’s spokesman added:
The ranges that appear in our stores reflect what our customers want to buy.
Ah, that’s the rub, but the fundies just don’t get it.

If the big stores are not selling religious cards, I’m sure the local charity shops would be happy to receive a few extra customers.
Christmas is a religious event? Hasn’t it always been an opportunity to spend time with the family and do something selfless for our fellow humans.
The idiotic thing about all this “secularization of Christmas” nonsense is that its ALWAYS been this way!
Christmas as we know it didn’t even exist until around the turn of the 20th century. It wasn’t widely celebrated in America or anywhere else prior to the American Civil War.
When it did become popularized it was popularized as a highly secularized holiday, FROM THE START. Christmas became popular through the secular stories about Christmas, or at least the stories that weren’t explicitly about “Jesus”, Twas the Night Before Christmas, A Christmas Carol, etc.
America’s most popular Christmas songs are all secular, and were almost all written in the 1920s-1940s. Winter Wonderland, Santa Clause is Coming to Town, Jingle Bells, etc.
The most popular Christmas TV productions are all secular, and were all created in the 1950s-1970s, about Santa Clause, Rudolf the Red nose Reindeer, Frosty the Snow Man, etc.
So apparently the war on Christmas has been going on for 100+ years, and apparently the war on Christmas is what has made Christmas popular in the first place.
Let’s face it, Christmas originated as a Christian adoption of an existing pagan holiday, it remained celebrated in its traditional pagan style of centuries with only nominal acknowledgement of its appropriated Christian theme, it fell out of favor and was widely ignored after the Protestant Reformation precisely BECAUSE OF its widely known pagan roots, then it was resurrected AS A SECULAR HOLIDAY in the 1800s, AND it was heavily commercialized from the moment of this new inception.
Christmas only became popular AS a secular holiday. If Christmas had been resurrected, not with Christmas trees, Santa Clause, Yule Logs, Frosty the Snow Man and Macy’s storefront displays, but purely with manger scenes at local churches and midnight masses and modest gift exchanges at home by a manger scene instead of under a gaudy tree, the holiday wouldn’t even be a national holiday today and no one would care about it at all.
No, its not the “secualrizers” who are engaging in a “war on Christmas” its the “secualrizers” who MADE Christmas as we know it today and its the Christian zealots who are engaging in the war on the modern Christmas tradition, a holiday that was built without them in the first place.
It’s not like “Season’s Greetings” is a new holiday card sentiment, though. Going by Google, it’s been in use since 1843.
I love the art on those old cards. Ellen Clapsaddle drew a picture of Santa answering a child’s prayer (http://bit.ly/foMxhF) and Louis Prang did the one that’s probably my favourite – frogs on parade cheering for “Santy!”
I think the people who do the most complaining are the ones in dire need of history lessons, frankly.
What these silly people refuse to face up to is that it is not the stores who are responsible for the decline in religious enthusiasm at Christmas. The stores, after all, survive by selling what their customers want to buy. There would be no point in stocking massive quantities of religious cards that never get bought.
They should see the stores and their stock levels as a “thermometer” of public opinion. That opinion is abandoning religion. Given the low percentage of religious cards on sale, it must be the case that even people who still retain a religious belief, whether actual or nominal, are nevertheless not buying religious cards.
The second mistake that they make is in asserting that Christmas is uniquely and solely a Christian festival. This has never been the case. The church imposed Christmas on an already existing mix of winter festivals.
In an enlightened age, we can celebrate that festival however we wish and do not need to take instructions from any special interest group. We defend their right to spend Christmas as they wish and they should extend the same courtesy to us. If they are not willing to do so, then they must expect to be treated as cranks.
The dimwitted fundies just don’t understand that shops stock stuff that sells, religious propaganda themed cards don’t. The fundies would ban secular cards if they could. Some of the comments on the Mail online site are priceless.
As far as I can see, as long as there are some Christian cards available these people do not have a problem. As long as there are some, then they can buy them. Also, in the internet age, you can buy stuff online if it is no longer popular enough for shops to stock. I buy Pagan Soltice cards from an online company called Heddingham Fair. Most of their stuff is a bit new-agey but their Pagan style Christmas cards are very good and often have information about Christmas traditions on the back.
Altogether a pathetic display of whingeing, I would say.
Loved the post by rationalrevolution.
As Thomas said there are plenty of other outlets for religious based cards. They could go to the obnoxious Salvation Army.
If the fundies wish to have xmas themed cards may I be of assistance?
1. Buy semi rigid card.
2. Go into computer word programme.
3. Insert fundie greeting of choice and add picture.
4. Put card into printer.
5. Press print.
Not fucking difficult is it?
Ah, the good old Daily Mail – a bastion of right-wing paranoia and xenophobia dressed up as a proper newspaper.
Living in Spain, I shop for cards on line as the local (English) outlets only seem to send cards I would send to my Granny (If I had one). This year, I had a great deal of difficulty finding anything remotely funny. Amazon – No; Ebay: only an advert for slightly humourous box of 40 (10 designs x 4) and 3 individual cards sold separately which were almost pornographic and could not be sent to families. Whatever happened to “Far Side” or Garfield, even Snoopy would have been acceptable. From my view, cards are getting more conservative, not less. Source suggestions for next year would be welcome… Hang on, has this become a “Dear Barry” site… Sorry… Oh Dear… Too late, I’ve posted.
@Newspaniard,
I hate to plug but ‘www.coolcards.co.uk’ have a small range of xmas cards for the atheist.
@1minion: That Clapsaddle illustration is wonderful! Here’s one of my own favourites:
http://0.tqn.com/d/antiques/1/0/I/M/1816096_2CH0X85OT.jpg
Private Eye Christmas cards are extremely funny – if rather expensive – but I see that they have sold out now. The RNLI always have an hilarious Giles card available!
http://www.rnlishop.org.uk/christmas/charity-christmas-cards/info/giles-cartoon/942035.html
oh no the world is coming to an end! cards say “seasons greetings” instead of “merry christmas”. what is the world coming to?
jesus wasn’t born on christmas anyway, december 25th has been sacred to dozens of religions over the centuries. about time “secularists” claimed the 25th of december for a while!
If this is such an issue for these people, why don’t they make their own kind of Xmas-cards, or order them from CofE or the Vatican?
Less than 1% eh? Hmm, if only that was true. Id say at least 90% of cards still say “Christmas” on them. So once we get rid of that I’ll be happy we’re getting somewhere. Happy Winter Solstice everyone!
)
I get all my cards in bulk from the Woodland Trust. People complain about yet another picture of a snow-covered forest on their cards like they got last year. But I don’t see why, it’s nice classy stuff which goes to a properly good cause, in the real world.
I always get all my cards from my local hospice, as it’s a cause close to my heart. They usually have a selection of religious and non-religious ones of good quality to choose from.
This year me and the missus got our xmas cards from the British Humanist Society. Excellent design on the front and a great message on the back about living life without religion or superstition. Hope some of our recipients read it and got the message.
Speaking of the BHS, I read an article in the Review section of today’s Observer about the life and times of Claire Raynor. Guess how much of it was devoted to her biggest passion in life, ie Humanism? You guessed it, not a single word! Not one. It’s like this aspect of Claire’s life has been totally airbrushed out of existence by the media.
I’m sure she would have something to say about the matter if she was still here!
Io Saturnalia!
RationalRevolution said:
“No, its not the “secualrizers†who are engaging in a “war on Christmas†its the “secualrizers†who MADE Christmas as we know it today and its the Christian zealots who are engaging in the war on the modern Christmas tradition, a holiday that was built without them in the first place.”
I really liked your post, you made many of the points I would have, but, secularism is not the same a paganism. The writings of Jesus’ birth, place the shepherds and their flocks on high hillsides which implies early to mid fall. The adoption of the winter solstice as a holiday was a move by the RC to absorb the pagans in outlying Roman conquered lands. Worshipping evergreen trees as a sign of eternal life, or orgies during the burning of the yule log is not secularism, it’s another brand of insanity.
Echoed by SilverTiger:
“The second mistake that they make is in asserting that Christmas is uniquely and solely a Christian festival. This has never been the case. The church imposed Christmas on an already existing mix of winter festivals.”
The real truth is that Christmas is a blasphemy against Christianity committed by those who claim to adore it the most. Those who really understand history have no choice but to bust a gut laughing at those who wish to preserve the holy theme of their favorite blasphemy.
NeoWolfe
Looks like god reads the daily mail and has taken appropriate action…
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-11979213
I have been thinking for a while now about buying a bulk supply of Yule cards (probably off ebay) and seeing how people react being send them instead. After all, if I must observe the local festival that’s Yule not Christmas.
Neowolfe: Only “Luke” mentions the shepherds. The only other Gospel to refer to “The Nativity” is St Matthew, which relates the story of the magi. As was pointed out very recently, both accounts contradict each other, and almost certainly have nothing to do with the birth of “Jesus of Nazareth” – whoever he was.
http://freethinker.co.uk/2010/12/07/catholic-league-moves-against-militant-atheists-in-the-2010-christmas-wars/
More whiny douchebaggery from the Christofascists who won’t be content until they force everybody to kowtow to their agenda.
Every year, the same old pettiness. I take it, seeing as they’re so hot on things adhering to what they’re named after, that they rename the days of the week, so as to avoid honouring various Norse gods…
Anyway, surely as True Christians™ they know that Christmas isn’t that important anyway. It’s the satanic Easter Bunny they should be shouting about…
Bjohn said:
” Only “Luke†mentions the shepherds.”
Since no date is mentioned in the gospels, and that is our best evidence for a date, I am left wondering what the hell your point is?
Are you trying to make a case that the myth was born on Dec 25th? Or are you just trying to antagonize me?
I guess I don’t care.
NeoWolfe
Strange comment, NeoWolfe. This is what I was referring to:
The writings of Jesus’ birth, place the shepherds and their flocks on high hillsides which implies early to mid fall.
It sounds from this as if you are taking seriously a complete myth, possibly invented by the author of “Luke’s” gospel himself!
@NeoWolfe “… orgies during the burning of the yule log is not secularism, it’s another brand of insanity.” Sounds a lot more fun than unwrapping another pullover.
@Buffy, Don’t worry, the Taliban are getting ready to abolish any and all festivities. They’ll probably start at Tower Hamlets and work out.
@Others: Thanks, I’ll check out your advised “funny card” sources.
Dear lunatic fundies and readers of the ‘Daily Fail’,
Christmas has fuck all to do with Christianity anyway. Point out the bit in the Bible to me that does, and I’ll eat my hat. The Christmas that we know has its roots in Paganism and other older belief systesm.
Merry Mid-Winter Festival, everyone.
x
Never mind all this nonsense about supermarkets not being religious.
I was at a bring and buy sale at the church round the corner last Saturday.
A couple of knackered Action Men and Barbies, some chipped teacups and a few 20 year old bottles of Avon perfume. Call that a Christmas shopping extravaganza?
I’m writing to the Department of Fair Trading to complain. Think I’ll tip off the Daily Mail while I’m at it.
I have a colleague who puts a sign on his classroom door ‘Put the Christ back in Christmas’.
I usually respond with ‘Put the Thor back in Thursday.’
It only works if you’re a Geordie, though.
Best comment so far, Don!
Best comment so far, Sarah!
(Apologies for the plagiarism, barriejohn!)
Putting the Frigg back in Fridays could be more fun…
Let’s have the fucking Sun back in Sundays!
BJohn said;
“It sounds from this as if you are taking seriously a complete myth, possibly invented by the author of “Luke’s†gospel himself!”
Ridiculous. The obvious intent of my post was to expose the pagan orgins of christmas, and that even the content of the bible, and those who DO!!! study the bible like it’s literal, agree that the date of christmas is erroneous.
Christmas is celebrated on the date of a pagan orgy with all the symbols and traditions. And if you believe the bible, the best evidence indicates he was born in the fall. Is that not a viable argument to expose the hypocrisy of organized religion????
If yes, then, I am left wondering what the hell is your major malfunction?
NeoWolfe
NeoWolfe: You have lost me completely!
rationalrevolution:
I like your submission so much that I want to use it elsewhere. May I have your permission to do so and how shall I credit you.