COMPANIES planning to use sexy female models to promote their wares in the People’s Republic of Londonistan need to rethink their advertising tactics, or face the wrath of Islamic modesty patrols who are going around defacing “disgusting” images of “naked” women.
H&M is one company that is being targeted in London (click on pic to to watch video)
The Commentator reported yesterday that Islamic zealots are patrolling the streets of London, accosting women and vandalising public property. The group, which is attempting to cordon off “Muslim areas”, has dubbed itself “Muslim Patrol”.
So far, it said, the group has posted two videos to its new YouTube account which was set up in December 2012. The first video shows the destruction of advertising and vandalising of bus shelters, both displaying images of H&M push-up bras. The second video sees the “vigilantes” approaching and harrassing members of the public for either consuming alcohol, dressing “inappropriately”, or being inebriated near a mosque.
Several of the videos uploaded to the account have already been removed as they violated YouTube’s terms and conditions. One specifically states that YouTube deemed it intentionally “designed to bully, harrass and threaten”.
The footage is likely to have come from East London, where ‘Shariah zones’ were set up last year. The new tactic of intimidation is said to appall local residents, who will likely find the “patrols” disconcerting.
In the videos, the “Muslim Patrol” is heard to say:
Alcohol banned. This is a Muslim area. Muslims patrol the area.
One young woman, when confronted by the patrol, states:
I am appalled, this is Great Britain.
One of the creators of the video is heard to remark:
We don’t care. It’s not so Great Britain.
Those involved, said The Commentator, are thought to be a part of an extremist network in East London and not linked to the wider Muslim community in the local area.
HAT TIP: Great Satan
The usual religious zealot approach: we have decided how you will live regardless of your views and we intend to force our behavioural demands on you. How are these zealots to be confronted? They are breaking the law? Or is dealing with them not something the police want to tackle?
Of course, the law being enforced depends on who you are and what you are doing. The killing of foxes by the posh boys, including cubbing (hounds rip the cubs apart to get a taste for blood) is something the police choose to ignore. And when our warrior prince, Harry Windsor, and friends shot some rare hen harriers and witnesses found the evidence almost immediately the CPF decided they was not sufficient likelihood of a prosecution to proceed. But don’t forget, as Dave reminds us, “We are all in this together.”
Of course they are “linked to the wider Muslim community”:
http://news.sky.com/story/1039122/family-jailed-in-egypt-for-becoming-christian
A few years ago, the BNP started plastering bus shelters, pub toilet walls, etc. around where I lived with stickers saying that their ‘patrols’ were operating in the area. It was, I have no doubt, intended to intimidate any ethnic members of the community rather than reassure anyone else. After a while no more stickers appeared. I can only assume that the moron(s) (maximum of two, no doubt) who had been putting them up got bored with being ignored and simply disappeared. The same will happen with these idiots.
AgentCormac: Fascists, one and all.
I’m not surprised to read this. The intolerant and fascist islamic ideology is determined to force its perverted ways upon the West; as we have seen by their use of violence [how they love killing], colonisation and over-breeding. The Government is too cowardly to find and arrest these poster vandals, but if you graffiti a mosque you’ll get banged up for a hate crime.
I’m tempted to go down there and swig from a whisky bottle outside a mosque (having first filled it with something non-alcoholic) with the deliberate intent of provoking a gang of these shitheads into starting trouble. This would of course all be videoed by an accomplice (were I able to find one) with a view to taking action against the troublemakers.
I’d probably be ignored, though, as I’m a big bugger who looks as though he can take care of himself …
They want to be persecuted as long as the persecution is of the comfortable variety available in the UK. That gives them media attention, feeds their self regard and allows them their “I am a christian” stance of which they seem so proud. What they don’t want, and keep well clear off, is the kind of persecution which leads to christians in muslim countries being banged up for long periods for their faith. I read that some previous muslims, who became christians, have been imprisoned with their children for ten years plus – in Egypt, I think. Our bunch are play acting. Put them to the test and they would run for cover.
I also read that our old mate Hamza is not too happy in the slammer in the USA. He may even may be developing a degree of nostalgia for the UK where he could get his social security, use the NHS and preach hatred for the country he described as a “toilet.”
It’s good that the girl in the video stood up to them and I wish more people would stand up to these pricks too and I think we need rational reasonable people to take a stand against these puritanical arseholes before the equally fuckwitted BNP and EDL get involved.
Broga
We can only hope you’re right.
http://tinyurl.com/5uydy8d
Typical religion, forcing it’s views onto others. As for the claims that they are patrolling a muslim area, I couldn’t give a toss about the percentage of muslims there, even if it’s above 50% it’s still a part of the UK and subject to UK laws, not their pathetic sharia shit.
Vandalising these posters is criminal damage, if they are caught I hope they are prosecuted.
Daz: Na. I messed up. I wrote that in the wrong place. I really meant it for the Four Persecuted Christians. I think with Muslims awaiting paradise with 73 virgins lusting after them they will go the entire distance. They won’t back off. If I truly, without doubt, and as certain of it as I am that my dog is lying against my feet, believed that I would be off myself and not hanging around here.
I suppose in paradise I would be young and fit and not old and knackered. Do you get to choose your age? I’ll choose 22. What about people who are demented? Are they put right as well? These important issues don’t get discussed. Nor do they for the christians heading for heaven. I think we should be told.
Sorry about the balls up.
Broga
Ah, the wonders of many-tabbed browsing!
‘What about people who are demented? Are they put right as well?’
The demented ones get the virgins, apparently.
If they try taking away the Roadkill T Shirts advert, I’m fucking joining the EDL.
(may not be a serious threat- but many a true word spoken in jest- etc)
remigus: Funny that. Not much about the feelings and reactions of the virgins. Maybe they are like the Stepford Wives.
‘Not much about the feelings and reactions of the virgins.’
So what. They’re only virgins. Fuck ‘em!
Here’s a thing: why would they want virgins? One has to ask the question: *why* are they virgins? There’s only one reason for anyone past puberty to be a virgin round where I live, and it’s not a good one …
“why would they want virgins?”
That is an interesting question. Surely anyone who knows anything at all about sex knows that an experienced partner is far more enjoyable.
It’s about ownership. And who wouldn’t prefer a brand new sex-slave, straight out of the box, over a previously owned one, right?
I think it is about possession and ownership. I read somewhere about women paying surgeons to “replace” the hymen. They want the women, as they see it, unsullied and untouched. The same rules, of course, don’t apply to men. The same demand for the “pure” woman was apparent in the UK not all that long ago. In Jane Austen’s novels the woman was expected to be a virgin. When Elizabeth Bennet’s sister (I forget which one) scarpered with her lover boy before she was married the family were desperate to get them hitched despite the man being, as her father said, one of the worst scoundrels in the country.
Again the men, particularly the aristocracy including grotesquely unattractive royals, were excused from the same standards. Yes, Daz, I think it is about ownership.
I suggest they fuck off to Afghanistan or some other primitive dysfunctional
muslim dump where they can really wallow in their shitty misery.
Why do they want virgins?
Well, if you’re emotionally immature, sexually inexperienced and generally inadequate then a partner who doesn’t know better is ideal.
Martyrs are offered virgins because the guy who dreamed it up liked them young and, presumably, thought every other man did to. These days we call men who fuck nine year old girls perverts.
Broga & Daz
The fact that the muslims’ vision of paradise has been so blatantly constructed around the prepubescent fantasies of blokes who clearly aren’t getting any tells us much about the veracity of their holy book.
What’s more, just how enticing would that vision of heaven be if you were a muslim woman who had spent a lifetime gestating, giving birth to and then rearing yet more muslim boys for your husband, whose only stated desire in life was to get to a ‘better place’ where he could shag umpteen virgins senseless?
Wankers. Literally and metaphorically.
The old hymen/virgin myth continues. As most of use know, the hymen [which is never the same size/shape] can break due to physical exercise, medical examination or masturbation. Also, post puberty the hymen becomes very flexible and may not give the sensation of “breaking” when having intercourse for the first time. This may be why the muzzie men are so obsessed with young, prepubescent girls. Anyone who penetrates a prepubescent girl should be shot.
“Anyone who penetrates a prepubescent girl should be shot.”
Perhaps that is whay so many muzzies go round killing each other, a sense of collective guilt. NO chance.
barriejohn,
Yes, indeed, they are part of the wider Moslem community. If the majority of Moslems are as “moderate” as their apologists, claim why are majority Moslem countries so backward and oppressive?
A good piece on the spread of islam from AAI: http://www.atheistalliance.org/news-a-articles/archive/600-the-onward-march-of-islamism-in-africa
Nice idea , Matt Westwood, was thinking of a similar trick, no matter alcohol or not,and maybe a bacon buttie as well, with a few counter intimidants (Milwall fans) hiding round the corner.I am sure that the publicity will facilitate this anyway,it being unlikely that our police force will actualy enforce english law against these musloons.Film would be good also,let the fools know whos country it is.
Some earlier comments have disappeared. Should we repost or are they likely to reappear?
Screw them. If they don’t like it they’re free to move to one of their theocratic Muslim hellholes, or to put on a pair of those special Jewish glasses that blur everything. Demanding the whole world wear shrouds to comply with their batshit insane 1st century beliefs is ludicrous.
This is what they would like to see:
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/three-men-stripped-and-lynched-having-gay-sex-nigeria160113
“Democracy go to hell”
It’s made the national press at last – hope this will wake peolpe up ; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2263905/Muslim-patrol-Hooded-vigilantes-walking-streets-London-telling-women-cover-taking-alcohol-hands-revellers-behave-Islamic-way.html
This cultural terrorism is nothing to be laughed at.
The muslims who plastered east London with stickers saying Gay Free Zone were seen on CCTV leaving East London Mosque (the mosque being “protected” by these thugs) with the stickers. The one muslim who was prosecuted for those stickers was given a slap on the wrist (a few months later he was imprisoned on terrorism charges: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/9260207/Extremist-behind-gay-free-zone-posters-jailed-for-possessing-al-Qaeda-literature.html_
The area this gang is “patrolling” is 1km from the gay bar outside which a young gay man was set upon by a gang of muslims, leaving the gay man paralysed from the waist down (these muslims stabbed him through the spine with a broken bottle). The media reported it as a “random” attack – http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/a-brush-with-death-why-britains-coolest-art-and-fashion-names-have-rallied-around-a-victim-of-random-knife-crime-1778125.html
After one of the gang who attacked Oliver Hemsley was imprisoned (and only one of them was imprisoned), the gang went to the gay bar outside which Oliver was attacked. They arrived with baseball bats and went into the bar and beat up the customers (showing the attack on Oliver was not “random”). The media did not report this attack on the bar and its customers. http://4freedoms.ning.com/xn/detail/3766518:Comment:94823
If a christian stood on a street corner and criticised same sex marraige there would be uproar by the very same people who are keeping quiet about these muslim patrols, these morons are so politcially correct they worry that criticising muslim bigots will be seen as racist.
The muslim patrol channel has been removed from youtube but I’m glad to see that the video is spreading, unfortunately genuinely racist knuckle dragging fuckwits are using it as an excuse to sput their vile racism, fuck the lot of them.
Kames@: Pink News got it right, but you are right about the rest of the media. Even the Mail reported it as a “random attack” (on Oliver Hemsley), refusing to name the perpetrator, ignoring the fact that he was a Muslim, and not mentioning the connection with the pub at all. You’d have thought, from what they said, that he had been randomly picked on as he walked down the street! The attack on the bar was also completely ignored by the mainstream media.
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/06/10/gay-rights-campaigners-call-for-mosques-to-ban-anti-gay-speakers/
For months, LGBT people walking along Hackney Road were subject to abuse and assaults, pelted with stones and eggs.
But they’re Muslims, of course!
ZombieHunter: We’ve been here before. We mustn’t look down on them because their “culture” is different to ours. That would be “cultural imperialism”!
There is a regular cultural relativist over on the Atheism UK forum, you can slag off anything you like but join a petition to outlaw sharia courts in the UK and you are completley out of order.
A mixture of PC and cultural-relativism crap from these apologists is the stuff these bigots feed on to try to promote their backward ideas.
It also does not help when we are trying to stop selfish bigots like the Chaplin nurse. I have heard some of her supporters say that an islamic nurse would get away with it. This is sadly true, I once got a lot of grief from a hospital when I refused to allow a nurse to change my dressing because there were marks on the end of her sleeves and she had not rolled them up before washing her hands and starting to do the dressing.
This is one area where I would agree with the xtian whingers, it should be one law for all.
I read from the ongoing court case that a gang of muslims branded an eleven year old girl they were using as a sex-slave with the letter M for Mo. Scum and vermin are the only suitable words to describe these thugs.
Angela: “Seven men of Pakistani origin and two from North Africa”!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2263924/Oxford-sex-gang-victim-aged-11-branded-initial-abuser.html
OT. I notice this site has gone off line a few times recently, including an hour ago. Have we had an attack of the hackers?
Angela_K. I think the snow may have got in the internet pipes.
Put up a naked poster of the Muslim pedophile prophet fiddling with his 9 year old wife and see what happens. Mad Mo in a bra and fishnets fiddling with a kid. Wouldn’t that be a laugh.
@Stephen: “I once got a lot of grief from a hospital when I refused to allow a nurse to change my dressing because there were marks on the end of her sleeves and she had not rolled them up before washing her hands and starting to do the dressing.”
On what grounds did she refuse to roll up her sleeves? The fact that her religion disallowed anyone but her owner to see her naked wrists?
An erstwhile colleague of my wife (who is a carer for the elderly) was able to get away with doing a lot of the personal care duties (you know, the messy, unpleasant and embarrassing stuff) because her religion forbade her to see men naked. The argument: what the iblis was she doing in such a career anyway? didn’t work because *she* was a *muzzlimb*, and therefore *far more important* than any of us mere *mortals*. Despicable.
Aargh, should have read “get away without doing a lot of the personal care duties”
Plenty of material for comedy sketches there, Matt, but not PC!
The worst aspect of all this is the ridiculous idea that a gay couple walking down the road minding their own business are somehow “provoking” an attack, and thus justifying mindless violence, and the equally bizarre idea that a woman showing some random flesh is somehow encouraging young Muslim men to rape her. What is wrong with these religiots? Have they no self control? Their minds must be full of the most evil thoughts, so what is the benefit of their devotion? A little while ago we had a prelate telling us that children were taking advantage of Catholic priests. Their minds seem to work in a very strange way, but is it the case that religion is itself responsible for such idiocy, or that mentally deficient people are attracted to religion?
@Matt, yes because she was owned by one of the beardy boys. Came to nothing in the end as the hospital made sure she did not come near me after that. Quite a few years ago now but I regret not pursuing it further. It was before a lot of the so called “islamophobia” shit and I thought it a one off.