News

Irish PM branded a ‘murderer’ for abortion reform; receives plastic foetuses and threats written in blood

THE Irish Government is to be commended for acting swiftly to reform the country’s abortion laws after Savita Halappanavar, 31,an Indian-born dentist who was miscarrying died after being refused an abortion in an Irish hospital, last October.

Abortion is currently illegal in Ireland except if there is a substantial risk to the mother’s life but there has been much confusion about implementing it. The new legislation is aimed at clarifying the rules that legalise abortions in exceptional cases where doctors deem it necessary to save a woman’s life.

But when the Government published a draft  abortion bill on Thursday aimed at ensuring that the horrifying Halappanavar incident is never repeated, hysterical anti-abortionists turned their fury on Prime Minister Enda Kenny, who – according to this report – revealed in Parliament that he had received plastic foetuses and letters written in blood claiming he is a murderer.

Enda Kenny

Enda Kenny

I am now being branded by personnel around the country as being a murderer, and that I am going to have on my soul the death of 20 million babies.

Kenny said he was a Catholic but he was proud to be a Taoiseach, or prime minister, for all the Irish people.

Meanwhile, an Irish Health Service Executive review into the death of Savita Halappanavar has identified failings in her health care. It concluded that staff did not adequately monitor her deteriorating condition and failed to:

Offer all management options to a patient experiencing inevitable miscarriage.

The report also said existing clinical guidelines related to the management of sepsis and septic shock were not correctly adhered to by staff.

The review team stated:

There was a lack of recognition of the gravity of the situation and of the increasing risk to the mother which led to passive approaches and delays in aggressive treatment. This appears to have been either due to the way the law was interpreted in dealing with the case or the lack of appreciation of the increasing risk to the mother and the earlier need for delivery of the foetus.

The HSE review added that there was:

An apparent over-emphasis on the need not to intervene until the foetal heart stopped together with an under-emphasis on the need to focus appropriate attention on monitoring for and managing the risk of infection and sepsis in the mother.

Savita Halappanavar

Savita Halappanavar

The investigation team’s report also said:

The interpretation of the law related to lawful termination in Ireland, and particularly the lack of clear clinical guidelines and training is considered to have been a material contributory factor in this regard.

The review team added that “similar incidents with a similar clinical context could happen again” unless there was:

Clarity as to the application of the law in a situation where it may be necessary for a doctor to consider, in the exercise of their clinical professional judgement, the termination of a pregnancy in the clinical welfare interest of their patient.

The report also said there could be a repeat of the Halappanavar case:

In the absence of appropriate national clinical guidelines on the clinical management of inevitable miscarriage. Among its recommendations, the review team stated:

There is an immediate and urgent requirement for a clear statement of the legal context in which clinical professional judgement can be exercised in the best medical welfare interests of patients.

In its call for new guidelines for doctors, the team added:

We recognise that such guidelines must be consistent with applicable law and that the guidance so urged may require legal change.

In April, an inquest into Halappanavar’s death recorded a verdict of medical misadventure.

The eight-day hearing, held in Galway, concluded there had been failures in her health care at the hospital, but did not apportion individual blame.

The inquest found there had been poor communication between staff members, inadequate assessment and monitoring and a failure to follow up blood test results that would have indicated the presence of infection.

Following world-wide controversy over Mrs Halappanavar’s death, which reopened the debate about the Irish Republic’s abortion law, the HSE launched its clinical review of her health care last November.

10 Responses to “Irish PM branded a ‘murderer’ for abortion reform; receives plastic foetuses and threats written in blood”

  1. Graham Martin-Royle says:

    When will the religious get the message. If they don’t want to do something then they don’t have to. If they are in a similar situation to Savita Halappanavar then it should be their choice as to whether they carry on with the pregnancy or have an abortion.

    That same right must be offered to everyone and that includes the non religious. The religious have no right to force their opinions onto others.

  2. OurSally says:

    >their choice as to whether they carry on with the pregnancy or have an abortion.

    you mean: whether they die or have an abortion

  3. Broga says:

    The predatory RC Church would prefer to see women driven to back street abortionists or to the UK in defence of their superstitions. As usual they threaten, exaggerate and try to impose their demented opinions on everyone. Meanwhile, their priests continue, as more revelations appear, to sexually abuse children. Young boys being their favoured victims. Their tolerance and protection of their raping priests makes an instructive comparison with their howls of outrage about Enda Kenny.

  4. The Woggler says:

    “Prime Minister Enda Kenny… revealed in Parliament that he had received plastic foetuses and letters written in blood claiming he is a murderer….”

    There’s nothing like making your point in a calm, reasoned, rational way, is there?

  5. Angela_K says:

    And these Catholic extremists wonder why so many turn away from religion. They are incapable of rational debate so must resort to obscene actions such as this – vile, disgusting people.

  6. barriejohn says:

    Whatever gloss is put upon it, they are being given special dispensation to discriminate against gay people in the UK now:

    http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2013/06/17/maria-miller-tables-public-order-act-amendment-protecting-critics-of-equal-marriage/

    As others have said, would anyone even consider allowing churches to discriminate against people on racial grounds, or on grounds of disability, for instance?

  7. L.Long says:

    …The report also said existing clinical guidelines related to the management of sepsis and septic shock were not correctly adhered to by staff….

    Exactly the right response! When things start going bad, then blame the workers that are following the bosses procedures. And since it was ‘a team’ then they can’t really pin this on some insignificant worker.

    So it aint our fault (whiny tone) as the laws says we cant and besides the workers were incompetent (whiny tone)!!!

    ….In April, an inquest into Halappanavar’s death recorded a verdict of medical misadventure….
    They were too scared to say …by religious bigotry and RCC BS.

  8. T says:

    Sounds like he should give up on the rcc and become a freethinking apostate. Now that would be a welcome move for all those who are sick and tired of the rcc and its bigoted criminal repressed unhealthily and murderous prejudices.

  9. Trevor Blake says:

    Everybody knows that only God is authorized to abort a fetus. Numbers 5:21-21, 27-28