Jesus & Mo T-shirts branded ‘offensive’ at the London School of Economics

ANOTHER nail in the coffin of free expression in the UK … Student Union Muslims and/or their dhimmi bitches stooges at the LSE used jackboot tactics to force the cover-up of Jesus and Mo T-shirts worn by members of the LSESU Atheist, Secularist and Humanist Student Society attending the annual Freshers’ Fair.

According to this report, Society members were warned by the Islamofascists that they would be physically removed from the fair unless they covered up the “offensive” garments.

An 'offensive' Jesus & Mo T-shirt. You can get yours here.

An ‘offensive’ Jesus & Mo T-shirt. You can get yours here.

The officials also removed materials from the LSESU Atheist, Secularist and Humanist Student Society stand. When asked for an explanation, they claimed that several students had complained about the T-shirts.

 

2013-10-04After a period of consultation a member of the LSE Legal and Compliance Team and Head of Security told the members of the society that the wearing of the T-shirts could be considered “harassment”, as it could “offend others” by creating an “offensive environment”.

After challenging the actions of LSE officials, members of the Society were told they were not behaving in an “orderly and responsible manner”. The group eventually complied by covering the T-shirts, but were closely followed by security guards for the remainder of the day.

In a written statement, Abishek Phadnis and Chris Moos of the LSESU Atheist, Secularist and Humanist Society, said:

We reject in the strongest possible terms that by wearing a non-violent, non-racist T-shirt we would harass other students or create an “offensive environment”. We reject completely that we were not behaving in an “orderly or responsible manner”. In fact, when faced with the entirely unreasonable request to change or cover up our clothing, we remained calm and asked for clarification on what rules or regulations we were alleged to be in breach of. Even though we completely disagreed with the instructions of the LSE, we still complied, making clear that we would challenge this decision through the appropriate procedures.

As much as we respect and defend the rights of others to wear whatever they choose to wear, we claim this right for ourselves. Our right to free expression and participation in the LSE student community is being curtailed for no other reason than that we are expressing views that are not shared by others. The T-shirts worn are harmless satirical depictions of fictitious religious figures and certainly cannot be considered intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive to anyone by even the most stringent standards.

This is not the first time that the Society has been caught up in a row over causing offence at LSE.

In 2012 the LSE Students’ Union effectively made blasphemy an offence following protests from Muslim students about a Jesus and Mo cartoon posted on the LSE Atheist, Secularist and Humanist student group’s Facebook page.

The LSESU passed a motion proposing that ‘Islamophobia is a form of anti-Islamic racism’. The Union resolved “To define Islamophobia as

A form of racism expressed through the hatred or fear of Islam, Muslims, or Islamic culture, and the stereotyping, demonisation or harassment of Muslims, including but not limited to portraying Muslims as barbarians or terrorists, or attacking the Qur’an as a manual of hatred.

It said it would take a firm stance against all Islamophobic incidents at LSE and conduct internal investigations if and when they occur.

Also in 2012, students from the University of Reading Atheist, Humanist and Secularist Society were forced to leave the Freshers’ Fair after they labelled a pineapple “Mohammed” and put it on their stall.

LSESU Atheist, Secularist and Humanist Student Society are being supported in their actions by the National Secular Society.

Stephen Evans, NSS campaigns manager, said:

There is something very disturbing about the curtailing of free speech on university campuses simply on the grounds of claimed offence. Being offended from time to time is the price you pay for living in an open and free society. If any religion is off-limits for open debate we are in a very dangerous situation.

Breaking News:

blasphemy-2006-02-03

Arab countries are working on a draft law that would make the “defamation “of religions illegal and would empower them to take miscreants to court – even if they are not residents.

The draft, presented by Qatar, is being reviewed by delegates from several Arab countries at the Arab League. Under its provisions, all forms of defamation, derision or denigration of religions and prophets will be considered crimes.

Ebrahim Mousa Al Hitmi, the Qatari Justice Ministry Assistant Undersecretary for Legal Affairs, said:

The main feature of the draft is that it gives every state the right to put on trial those who abuse and hold in contempt religions even if they are outside the country.

 The official insisted that the draft law does not clash with freedom of expression.

The law does not interfere in any way with the freedom of opinion and expression which is well protected and guaranteed. All penal laws in Arab countries criminalise defamation of religions but there are no specific sanctions when an abuser is outside the country. Therefore, the main goal of this law is to deter all forms of defamation of religions and give each country that ratifies it the right to file lawsuits against those who offend religions, even if they are not residents.

The official attributed the Qatari initiative to a drive to counter “relentless campaigns targeting religions”.

The draft will be taken up by the Arab justice ministers when they convene.

Oh, for the record, this is Islamophobia Awareness Month in the UK.

Hat tip: Graham Martin-Royle, BarrieJohn and Leo Igwe