Is Ben Carson the new G W Bush?
An article I stumbled across this week claimed that conservative Americans have no-one in the wings who could put the US firmly back on a Christian footing in the way George W Bush did, except, perhaps, Ben Carson.
Carson is Professor Emeritus of neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins University and author of the new book One Nation: What We Can All Do to Save America’s Future.
The report said that of all the Republicans weighing a bid for president in 2016, the only one who puts a smile on the face of Pastor Gino Geraci – the founding pastor of Calvary South Denver, a sprawling evangelical church with several thousand congregants – is “doctor-turned-conservative-media-darling Ben Carson”.
And yet, Geraci concedes, Carson is ‘not in the mainstream’ and has little chance of ever being elected.
Which is an enormous relief, given that Carson – judging from an article he penned this week for the National Review Online – is as much of a numbskull as a Dubya. The only difference between the two is that Carson has charisma, is far easier on the eye and can string two sentences together better than Bush ever could, but the end result is pure garbage.
In his article, Carson referred to the Freedom From Religion Foundation as:
A self-serving group of religious fanatics.
Here’s the context:
Many people in this country were shocked when the US Navy recently announced the removal of all Bibles from military hotels under their control. This was in response to pressure from the Freedom From Religion Foundation, a well-known atheist group.
The surprise is not the hypocritical stance of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, but rather the fact that an established bulwark of American strength and patriotism caved to a self-serving group of religious fanatics. The previous sentence may seem out of place if you don’t realize that atheism is actually a religion.
Yes, that stupid old chestnut. But stay with us, there’s more. Much more!
Like traditional religions, atheism requires strong conviction. In the case of atheists, it’s the belief that there is no God and that all things can be proved by science. It is extremely hypocritical of the foundation to request the removal of Bibles from hotel rooms on the basis of their contention that the presence of Bibles indicates that the government is choosing one religion over another. If they really thought about it, they would realize that removal of religious materials imposes their religion on everyone else.
Read on and you’ll see why Geraci is all moist at the crotch for Carson:
Some atheists argue that there should be a library or cache of religious material at the check-in desk of a hotel from which any guests could order a Bible, Torah, or Koran for their reading pleasure. No favoritism would be shown through such a system, and those who reject the idea of God would not have to be offended.
This is like saying there shouldn’t be certain brands of bottled water in hotel rooms because there may be guests who prefer a different type of water or are offended by bottled water and think everybody should be drinking tap water. The logical answer to such absurdity would, of course, be that the offended individual could bring his own water or simply ignore the brand of water he does not care for.
As a nation, we must avoid the paralysis of hypersensitivity, which prevents us from getting anything done because virtually everything offends someone. We need to distribute “big boy” pants to help the whiners learn to focus their energy in a productive way. We must also go back and read the Constitution, including the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of religion.
It says nothing about freedom from religion, and in fact, if you consider the context and the lives of those involved in the crafting of our founding documents, it is apparent that they believed in allowing their faith to guide their lives. This has nothing to do with imposing one’s beliefs on someone else.
Those of us who do believe in God can hope and pray that at some point secular progressives will come to understand that they must abide by the same rules with which they attempt to control others. There is nothing wrong with the philosophy of ‘live and let live’. America was designed to be a free country, where people could live as they pleased and pursue their dreams as long as they didn’t infringe upon the rights of others.
By continually broadening the scope of an “infringement” on the rights of others, the purveyors of division will succeed in destroying our nation — but only if we continue to cater to their divisive rhetoric.
Liberty and justice for all has worked extremely well for an extended period of time, and there is no reason to upset the equilibrium by endowing the hypersensitive complainers in our society with more power than everyone else. Thankfully, the Navy quickly realized its mistake and restored the Bible to its lodges. Maybe now we can deal with the real issues that threaten our safety.
In the first report that alerted me to his existence, Carson is said to have accused the Republican Party of turning its back on some of its core supporters:
In the rush to get on the political-correctness bandwagon, people have abandoned the concept of faith. That is where the disconnect is.