News

NSS challenges Bible-based sex ed

NSS challenges Bible-based sex ed

The National Secular Society has urgently raised the issue of faith-based sex education with Nicky Morgan, the Secretary of State for Education, following a complaint it received about a school in Middlesborough.

According to this report, the sex and health education policy of the King’s Academy warns pupils of the “consequences” if they ignore the “Maker’s Instructions” about sex and relationships.

The taxpayer-funded school teaches “chastity outside of marriage”, that “human life begins at conception” and that marriage is “the lifelong union between a man and a woman.”

The school begins their policy statement on sex education by stating that they:

Believe that human beings are created to a Divine design.

And it adds that:

Sexual information will be presented across the School Curriculum within a Biblical moral framework.

The Academy describes its ethos as based on “traditional Christian faith” and the school website says Jesus is:

The perfect example of how to know God and love our neighbour as ourselves.

The mission statement for King’s Academy says the school is:

Committed to upholding Biblical values, concepts and morality.

Noting that “other lifestyles exist”, the school claims that delivery of SRE takes place in the “absence of judgemental dogma”, but ends its policy with the teaching that abstinence is:

The only 100% effective form of contraception.

120041

Year 9 students have “special lectures” by “staff and medical practitioners” who present the “Biblical advice on chastity before marriage” and who give so-called “medical reasons” for abstinence before marriage.

The school covers “stereotyping and prejudice” about homosexuality but within the school’s teaching “marriage is presented” as only between a man and a woman.

Religious education for Year 7 students covers different “gender roles” and “the institution of marriage”.

The policy notes that parents have the “right to withdraw” their child from the programme, but given the pervasive nature of religion throughout the teaching, and that the Bible is presented as authoritative “across the School Curriculum” and throughout different subjects, it is unclear how realistic such a right to withdrawal actually is for parents who do not want their pupils taught SRE from a “biblical” perspective.

The parent who contacted the NSS about the school said:

This is why we need a fully secular education system for state-funded schools.

The parent added that the school’s policy needed to be “fully exposed” and that the public “has a right to know” what taxpayer-funded schools are teaching.

Stephen Evans, National Secular Society campaigns manager, said:

If the Government seriously wants to prepare young people for adult life it should ensure that all schools, including faith schools, free schools and academies, have a statutory duty to teach comprehensive and unbiased sex and relationships education.

Any school which allows its religious ethos to take precedence over the health and wellbeing of its pupils is not worthy of public funding.

Evidence suggests that abstinence based approaches can be worse than ineffective, leaving young girls more vulnerable to teenage pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. LGBT children are also put at risk by the ability of faith schools to teach SRE within their religious framework.

He added:

If schools are unable to distinguish between evidence-based fact and religious belief then there are serious questions as to whether they’re capable of running schools in young people’s best interests.

Children’s education shouldn’t be based on dogma. Taxpayers should not be paying for the propagation of religious beliefs in state-funded schools.

Maintained secondary schools are required to provide basic sex education but academies and free schools do not have to follow the National Curriculum and so are not under the same statutory obligations.

In February 2015, MPs on the Education Select Committee recommended sex and relationship education become mandatory. The Government’s response to the select committee report is expected soon.

In a submission to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, the National Secular Society this week warned that some schools are failing to put the best interest of young people first and urged the Committee to recommend that UK legislation should require all state-funded schools to provide comprehensive age appropriate sex and relationships education with no permitted opt-outs.

Hat tip: AgentCormac

14 responses to “NSS challenges Bible-based sex ed”

  1. David Anderson says:

    And the bike sheds are a no go área.

  2. asquith says:

    And so it is that a load of girls will get expelled for being pregnant.But not the boys, they won’t be blamed for being led astray by fallen women.

  3. AgentCormac says:

    Makes my blood boil that my taxes are being spent on this archaic nonsense and blatant religious indoctrination. These so-called schools should not exist – simple as.

  4. barriejohn says:

    Like many other academies, it’s not even a particularly successful educational establishment; banging on about “improvement”, and bleating about the “inaccurate presentation” of results, says it all really.

    http://www.kingsacademy.org.uk/information/exam-results/

    I just love the way that the headmaster keeps signing himself off as Mr Chris Drew!

  5. barriejohn says:

    It’s one of Sir Peter Vardy’s schools; say no more!

    In 2002, a group of leading scientists including Richard Dawkins alleged that creationism was taught in biology classes at Emmanuel College. Steven Layfield, the College’s Head of Science and a creationist, had delivered a lecture urging teachers to promote creationism to pupils, parents, and colleagues, including in science classes. Layfield later resigned from the board of a creationist body to underscore the separation between his private views and the school’s teaching of science.

    More here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmanuel_Schools_Foundation#Controversy

  6. Brian Jordan says:

    This school was founded by Peter Vardy, creationist. No surprises there, then. However, their web sit says
    “ESF was originally sponsored by Sir Peter Vardy who, in 2010, asked United Learning (UL) to take on the strategic oversight of the schools.”
    Now Wikipedia has this to say about United Learning
    “It was formed in 2002 as a subsidiary of the United Church Schools Trust (UCST) which has been running independent schools in the UK since 1883.”
    So evidently no change there, then. The Wikipedia article is quite interesting on their SRE teaching.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Learning

  7. Melvin Polatnick says:

    Sex education should include anus and sphincter birth control, not only bible based nonsense.

  8. Trevor Blake says:

    Numbers 31:1-54 has some good advice for young people about sex.

  9. barriejohn says:

    Brian Jordan: Thanks for that. My facts are obviously a bit out of date!

  10. barriejohn says:

    Trevor Blake: If any of that wanton destruction, in a limited area like Canaan, actually took place, wouldn’t one expect at least SOME evidence of the same? Still, nice to see that they had to “purify” themselves afterwards; after all, it wouldn’t do for God’s holy nation to be in any way contaminated, would it? And if anyone should jump to the conclusion that the god of the Old Testament is a violent, vengeful tyrant, the answer is revealed here:

    https://carm.org/god-of-old-testament-a-monster

    They could have easily escaped their destruction. However, they stubbornly chose to remain and fight against Israel instead.

    Tut! Tut!

  11. .Korgu says:

    The sexually repressed pass on their repression to kids and so it goes on. Sexual repression is dangerous, really dangerous, the ultimate result of which is the fanatically violent murderous primitive brutality of virgin muslim men who vent their frustration by killing others.

  12. Vanity Unfair says:

    ‘The mission statement for King’s Academy says the school is:
    Committed to upholding Biblical values, concepts and morality.
    ….. but ends its policy with the teaching that abstinence is:
    The only 100% effective form of contraception.’

    Unless your name is Mary, of course.

  13. Dionigi says:

    When the new E-petitions web site is up and running get everybody to sign a petition to stop publicly funded religious schools. Usually not enough signatures are added to even get to debate stage, if enough people can be convinced to sign even polititions can see which way public feeling is and act accordingly.
    This comes down to Tony Blair and his pal Vardy acting together to to ensure that religious schools were brought back.